Postintubation airway injury in the pediatric intensive care unit / Lesiones de la vía aérea postintubación en la unidad de terapia intensiva pediátrica

Introduction and objectives Airway injury caused by endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a common event in children who require ETI in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The main aim of our study was to determine the incidence and the predisposing factors for the development of airway injury in PICU patients who need ETI. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the reasons for the request of airway endoscopy examination and the tracheostomy rate in this population. Materials and methods A retrospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted evaluating 1854 patients who were intubated in the PICU of a tertiary-care center between May 2015 and April 2019. Results The mean age of all intubated patients was 35.6 months and of those who required endoscopy 27.3 months (p = 0.04). Mean length of intubation was 7.2 days for all intubated patients and 23.5 days for those who required endoscopy (p = 0.0001). Extubation failure and stridor were significantly associated with the finding of airway injury (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0006, respectively). Conclusions The incidence rate of ETI-related injury was 3%. Age younger than 27 months and intubation for more than 7 days were predisposing factors for the development of injury.The main indications for endoscopy were extubation failure and stridor, both related to the presence of injury. Tracheostomy rate in the PICU was 3.34%. (AU)

Introducción y objetivos Las lesiones de la vía aérea por intubación endotraqueal (IET) son procesos patológicos causados por el trauma de los tejidos durante dicha condición. El principal objetivo fue determinar la incidencia y los factores predisponentes para el desarrollo de lesión de la vía aérea en pacientes que requirieron IET en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica (UTIP). Los objetivos secundarios fueron evaluar las indicaciones de endoscopía y el porcentaje de pacientes traqueostomizados en dicha población. Materiales y métodos Estudio retrospectivo, observacional y descriptivo, de 1854 pacientes intubados en un centro de tercer nivel de complejidad entre Mayo de 2015 y Abril de 2019.ResultadosLa media de edad de los pacientes intubados fue de 35,6 meses y la de los que requirieron endoscopía de la vía aérea fue de 27,3 meses (p = 0,04). El promedio de días de intubación de los pacientes intubados fue de 7,2 días y el de los que requirieron endoscopía fue de 23,5 días (p = 0,0001). El fallo de extubación programada y el estridor se relacionaron con la presencia lesión (p = 0,0001 y p = 0,0006, respectivamente). Conclusiones La incidencia de lesiones asociadas a la IET fue del 3%. La edad menor a 27 meses y la intubación por más de 7 días fueron los factores predisponentes para el desarrollo de lesiones. Las principales indicaciones de endoscopía fueron el fallo de extubación programada y el estridor; ambas se relacionaron con la presencia de lesión. El porcentaje de traqueostomías realizadas en la UTIP fue del 3,34%. (AU)

Comparison of video laryngoscope, video stylet, and flexible videoscope for transoral endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways: a randomized, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: The 2022 ASA guidelines recommend the video laryngoscope, video stylet, and flexible videoscope as airway management tools. This study aims to compare the efficacy of three airway devices in intubating patients with difficult airways. METHODS: A total of 177 patients were selected and randomized into the following three groups: the video laryngoscope group (Group VL, n = 59), video stylet group (Group VS, n = 59), and flexible videoscope group (Group FV, n = 59). The success rate of the first-pass intubation, time of tracheal intubation, level of glottic exposure, and occurrence of intubation-related adverse events were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients were successfully intubated with three devices. The first-pass intubation success rate was significantly higher in Groups VS and FV than in Group VL (96.61% vs. 93.22% vs. 83.05%, P < 0.01), but it was similar in the first-pass intubation success rate between Groups VS and FV(P > 0.05). The number of patients categorized as Wilson-Cormack-Lehane grade I-II was fewer in Group VL than in Groups VS and FV (77.97% vs. 98.30% vs. 100%, P = 0.0281). The time to tracheal intubation was significantly longer in Group FV(95.20 ± 4.01) than in Groups VL(44.56 ± 4.42) and VS(26.88 ± 4.51) (P < 0.01). No significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of adverse intubation reactions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with difficult airways requiring intubation, use of the video stylet has the advantage of a relatively shorter intubation time, and the flexible videoscope and video stylet yield a higher first-pass intubation success rate and clearer glottic exposure than the use of the video laryngoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. No: ChiCTR2200061560, June 29, 2022.

Efficacy of McGRATH®MAC videolaryngoscope blade 1 for tracheal intubation in small children: a randomized controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Videolaryngoscopes may not be as effective in small children as they are in older children and in adults. The size 1 blade is commercially available for the McGRATH®MAC videolaryngoscope (Covidien, Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan), but its efficacy in comparison with a Macintosh laryngoscope blade 1 is not known. AIM: The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of McGrath®MAC blade 1 in comparison with a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope blade 1, in children aged less than 24 months. METHODS: Thirty-eight children aged less than 24 months were randomly allocated to one of two groups, and tracheal intubation was attempted using either a direct laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade 1 or a videolaryngoscope with a McGRATH®MAC blade 1. In another 12 children aged 2-4 years, the same comparisons were made with blade 2. The primary outcome measure was time to tracheal intubation using a size 1 blade. RESULTS: Tracheal intubation took significantly longer with a McGRATH®MAC blade 1 (median (interquartile range): 38.0 (31.8-43.5) s) than with the Macintosh blade 1(27.4 (25.9-29.2) s) (p < 0.0001; median difference (95% CI for the median difference): 10.6 (6.4-14.0) s), mainly due to difficulty in advancing a tube into the trachea. No significant difference was observed for the size 2. CONCLUSIONS: In small children without predicted difficult airways, time to intubate the trachea was significantly longer for a McGRATH®MAC blade 1 than a Macintosh blade 1. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT1032220366.

The Evolution of Equipment and Technology for Visualising the Larynx and Airway.

Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are the core skills of an anaesthetist. The tools and equipment used today are unrecognisable from the methods used in the first recorded attempts at laryngoscopy over 200 years ago. The evolution of the modern-day laryngoscopes has mirrored advancements in technology within general society, and particularly with regard to computer and fibreoptic technology over the last 30 years. The development of these modern visualisation devices would not have been possible without those that went before it, as each new device has been influenced by the previous. Video laryngoscopes have quickly gained popularity as the primary intubating device in many scenarios, driven by ease of use as well as positive patient outcomes. While it is still debated whether videolaryngoscopes can replace direct laryngoscopy for routine intubations, their effectiveness in difficult airways is unquestioned. This chapter will cover the anatomy of the airway and the development of technology from the rudimentary creations in the early 1700s to the modern larynsgocopes created in the twenty-second century which allow the user to view the airway in more detail in order to secure endotracheal intubation even in an airway where intubation would be difficult.

Infrared flashing light through the cricothyroid membrane as guidance to awake intubation with a flexible bronchoscope: A randomised cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: In case of distorted airway anatomy, awake intubation with a flexible bronchoscope can be extremely difficult or even impossible. To facilitate this demanding procedure, an infrared flashing light source can be placed on the patient's neck superficial to the cricothyroid membrane. The light travels through the skin and tissue to the trachea, from where it can be registered by the advancing bronchoscope in the pharynx and seen as flashing white light on the monitor. We hypothesised that the application of this technique would allow more proximal and easier identification of the correct pathway to the trachea in patients with severe airway pathology. METHODS: As part of awake intubation, patients underwent insertion of a flexible video bronchoscope via the mouth into the trachea. The procedure was performed twice, in random order in each patient, with and without the aid of the transcutaneous flashing infrared light. All insertions were video recorded to determine at which anatomical landmark within the airway the correct pathway was identified. The videos are accessible via this link: https://airwaymanagement.dk/infrared_comparative. The predefined landmarks were in successive order: oral cavity, oro-pharynx, tip of epiglottis, arytenoid cartilages, false cords, vocal cords and trachea, as well as the spaces between them. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had a total of 44 awake insertions with the flexible bronchoscope. The median anatomical level, at which correct identification of the trachea was obtained on the monitor, was, past the epiglottis, with the conventional technique, and at the level of the oropharynx, when using the infrared flashing light (p = .005). The time until the flashing light or the vocal cords were seen was 21 (22) S, mean (SD), and 48 (62) S, during the insertion with and without infrared flashing light activated, respectively (p = .005). Endoscopists rated it easier (p = .001) to recognise the entrance to the trachea in the infrared-group. CONCLUSION: During awake intubation of patients with airway pathology, the application of trans-cricothyroid infrared flashing light to guide the insertion of a flexible bronchoscope significantly facilitated the recognition of the pathway into the trachea and the correct advancement of the flexible endoscope. REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT03930550.

Comparison of two sizes of GlideScope® blades in tracheal intubation of infants: a randomised clinicaltrial.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate size of GlideScope® blade for tracheal intubation in neonates and premature infants has not been established. We evaluated the impact of the size of the GlideScope® blade on the time taken for intubation in infants weighing 2.5-3.6 kg. METHODS: Sixty infants weighing 2.5-3.6 kg were randomly assigned to use of the size 1 blade (n=30) or the size 2 blade (n=30). The primary outcome was the time taken to intubate. Components related to the laryngoscopic view which could affect the duration of the intubating process were also analysed. RESULTS: The time required for tracheal intubation was shorter with the size 2 blade than with the size 1 blade (16 [14-20] s vs 22 [18-25] s, P=0.002; median difference=-5; 95% confidence interval, -7 to -2). The rate at which the tip of the tracheal tube was located at the centre of the laryngeal inlet was higher with the size 2 blade than with the size 1 blade (83% vs 40%, P<0.001). Correlation analysis indicated that the time required to find the tip of the tube was related to how far the lower border of the arytenoid cartilages was located from the mid-horizontal line of the monitor (r=0.28, P=0.033). CONCLUSION: Use of the size 2 blade significantly reduced the time required to intubate the trachea, compared with the size 1 GlideScope® blade in infants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT 0003867.

Educational suitability of new channel-type video-laryngoscope with AI-based glottis guidance system for novices wearing personal-protective-equipment.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine which of 4 laryngoscopes, including A-LRYNGO, a newly developed channel-type video-laryngoscope with an embedded artificial intelligence-based glottis guidance system, is appropriate for tracheal intubation training in novice medical students wearing personal protective equipment (PPE).Thirty healthy senior medical school student volunteers were recruited. The participants underwent 2 tests with 4 laryngoscopes: Macintosh, McGrath, Pentax Airway-Scope and A-LRYNGO. The first test was conducted just after a lecture without any hands-on workshop. The second test was conducted after a one-on-one hands-on workshop. In each test, we measured the time required for tracheal intubation, intubation success rate, etc, and asked all participants to complete a short questionnaire.The time to completely insert the endotracheal tube with the Macintosh laryngoscope did not change significantly (P = .177), but the remaining outcomes significantly improved after the hands-on workshop (all P < .05). Despite being novice practitioners with no intubation experience and wearing PPE, the, 2 channel-type video-laryngoscopes were associated with good intubation-related performance before the hands-on workshop (all P < .001). A-LRYNGO's artificial intelligence-based glottis guidance system showed 93.1% accuracy, but 20.7% of trials were guided by the vocal folds.To prepare to manage the airway of critically ill patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, a channel-type video-laryngoscope is appropriate for tracheal intubation training for novice practitioners wearing PPE.

Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Taipei, Taiwan: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prehospital advanced airway management with either initial endotracheal intubation (ETI) or initial supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ETI and SGA in patients with nontraumatic OHCA. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal intubation (SAVE) trial was a multicenter cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in Taipei City, Taiwan. Individuals aged 20 years or older who experienced nontraumatic OHCA requiring advanced airway management and were treated by participating emergency medical service agencies were enrolled from November 11, 2016, to December 31, 2019. The final day of follow-up was February 19, 2020. Interventions: Four advanced life support ambulance teams were divided into 2 randomization clusters, with each cluster assigned to either ETI or SGA in a biweekly period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the SAVE trial was sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (≥2 hours) after resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included prehospital ROSC, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category score less than or equal to 2. Prespecified subgroups and the association between time to advanced airways were explored. Per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis were performed. Results: A total of 936 patients (517 in the ETI group and 419 in the SGA group) were included in the primary analysis (median age, 77 [IQR, 62-85] years; 569 men [60.8%]). The first-attempt airway success rates were 77% with ETI (n = 413) and 83% with SGA (n = 360). Sustained ROSC was 26.9% (n = 139) in the ETI group vs 25.8% (n = 108) in the SGA group. The odds ratio of sustained ROSC was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.06) in the ETI group vs SGA group. The odds ratio of ETA vs SGA was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07) for prehospital ROSC, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) for survival to hospital discharge, and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.03) for cerebral performance category scores less than or equal to 2. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, among patients with OHCA, initial airway management with ETI did not result in a favorable outcome of sustained ROSC compared with SGA device insertion. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02967952.

Performance of custom made videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Videolaryngoscope is regarded as the standard of care for airway management in well-resourced setups however the technology is largely inaccessible and costly in middle and low-income countries. An improvised and cost-effective form of customized videolaryngoscope was proposed and studied for patient care in underprivileged areas however there were no distinct conclusions on its performances. METHOD: The study follows PRISMA guidelines for systematic review and the protocol in International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The primary aim was to assess the first attempt success of customized videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the number of attempts, laryngoscopic view in terms of Cormack Lehane score and Percentage of glottic opening, use of external laryngeal maneuver and stylet and, the airway injuries after the endotracheal intubation. RESULT: Five studies were analyzed for risk of bias using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for cross-sectional studies. Most of the studies had a poor to a fair level of evidence with only one study with a good level of evidence. Certainty of evidence was "very low" for all eligible studies when graded using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: The certainty of the evidence regarding performance of custom-made videolaryngoscope compared to conventional laryngoscope was very low and the study was performed in small numbers with fair to the poor risk of bias. It was difficult to establish and do further analysis regarding whether the customized form of videolaryngoscope will improve the first attempt success rate for tracheal intubation, reduce the number of attempts, improve the laryngoscopic view, require fewer external aids and reduce the incidences of airway injury with the given low-grade evidence. Some properly conducted randomised clinical trials will be required to further analyze the outcome and make the strong recommendations.

Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is still the gold standard of airway management, but in cases of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, ETI is associated with risks for both the patient and the medical personnel. We hypothesized that the Vie Scope® is more useful for endotracheal intubation of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cardiac arrest patients than the conventional laryngoscope with Macintosh blade when operators are wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: Study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed by Emergency Medical Services in Poland. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital setting were included. Patients under 18 years old or with criteria predictive of impossible intubation under direct laryngoscopy, were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to Vie Scope® versus direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade. Study groups were compared on success of intubation attempts, time to intubation, glottis visualization and number of optimization maneuvers. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, aged 43-92 years. Compared to the VieScope® laryngoscope, use of the Macintosh laryngoscope required longer times for tracheal intubation with an estimated mean difference of -48 s (95%CI confidence interval [CI], -60.23, -35.77; p < 0.001). Moreover VieScope® improved first attempt success rate, 93.3% vs. 51.1% respectively (odds ratio [OR] = 13.39; 95%CI: 3.62, 49.58; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Vie Scope® laryngoscope in OHCA patients improved the first attempt success rate, and reduced intubation time compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in paramedics wearing PPE for against aerosol generating procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials registration number NCT04365608.

Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for neonates.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is a commonly performed procedure in neonates, the risks of which are well-described. Some endotracheal tubes (ETT) are equipped with a cuff that can be inflated after insertion of the ETT in the airway to limit leak or aspiration. Cuffed ETTs have been shown in larger children and adults to reduce gas leak around the ETT, ETT exchange, accidental extubation, and exposure of healthcare workers to anesthetic gas during surgery. With improved understanding of neonatal airway anatomy and the widespread use of cuffed ETTs by anesthesiologists, the use of cuffed tubes is increasing in neonates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of cuffed ETTs (inflated or non-inflated) compared to uncuffed ETTs for respiratory support in neonates. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, and CINAHL on 20 August 2021; we also searched trial registers and checked reference lists to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-randomized trials comparing cuffed (inflated and non-inflated) versus uncuffed ETTs in newborns. We sought to compare 1. inflated, cuffed versus uncuffed ETT; 2. non-inflated, cuffed versus uncuffed ETT; and 3. inflated, cuffed versus non-inflated, cuffed ETT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal. Two review authors independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We identified one eligible RCT for inclusion that compared the use of cuffed (inflated if ETT leak greater than 20% with cuff pressure 20 cm H2O or less) versus uncuffed ETT. The author provided a spreadsheet with individual data. Among 76 infants in the original manuscript, 69 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this Cochrane Review. We found possible bias due to lack of blinding and other bias. We are very uncertain about frequency of postextubation stridor, because the confidence intervals (CI) of the risk ratio (RR) were very wide (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.35 to 5.25; risk difference (RD) 0.03, -0.11 to 0.18; 1 study, 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No neonate was diagnosed with postextubation subglottic stenosis; however, endoscopy was not available to confirm the clinical diagnosis. We are very uncertain about reintubation for stridor or subglottic stenosis because the CIs of the RR were very wide (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.01 to 6.49; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.05; 1 study, 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No neonate had surgical intervention (e.g. endoscopic balloon dilation, cricoid split, tracheostomy) for stridor or subglottic stenosis (1 study, 69 participants). Neonates randomized to cuffed ETT may be less likely to have a reintubation for any reason (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.45; RD -0.39, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.21; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome 3, 95% CI 2 to 5; 1 study, 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about accidental extubation because the CIs of the RR were wide (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.12 to 5.46; RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.10; 1 study, 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization because the CIs of the RR were extremely wide (RR 2.46, 95% CI 0.10 to 58.39; RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.10; 1 study, 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There is one ongoing trial. We classified two studies as awaiting classification because outcome data were not reported separately for newborns and older infants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for comparing cuffed versus uncuffed ETTs in neonates is limited by a small number of babies in a single RCT with possible bias. There is very low certainty evidence for all outcomes of this review. CIs of the estimate for postextubation stridor were wide. No neonate had clinical evidence for subglottic stenosis; however, endoscopy results were not available to assess the anatomy. Additional RCTs are necessary to evaluate the benefits and harms of cuffed ETTs (inflated and non-inflated) in the neonatal population. These studies must include neonates and be conducted both for short-term use (in the setting of the operating room) and chronic use (in the setting of chronic lung disease) of cuffed ETTs.

Fiabilidad del control de presión del neumotaponamiento del tubo endotraqueal por el método de palpación digital en el Centro Médico Teknon / Reliability of palpation-based endotracheal cuff pressure assessment in Centro Médico Teknon

Introducción:La presión del neumotaponamiento no es estrictamente controlada durante las intervenciones quirúrgicas. La medición objetiva se reemplaza por la medición mediante dígito-palpación, inexacta y con tendencia a la hiperinsuflación. Ésta genera complicaciones postoperatorias (dolor, tos y ronquera). El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la fiabilidad del inflado del neumotaponamiento por digito-palpación realizado por personal experto. Material y métodos:Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal en pacientes operados electivamente en nuestro centro bajo anestesia general e intubación endotraqueal, entre octubre y diciembre de 2020. Se incluyeron 138 pacientes. Se registraron parámetros biométricos y el inflado del neumotaponamiento por dígito-palpación de personal experto, y se comparó con medición por manómetro para ajuste siempre a una presión estandarizada (30 cm H2O). Se midió con manómetro la presión al final del procedimiento, y se analizó su variación respecto a la inicial y su relación con posición quirúrgica, duración de intervención y diámetro del tubo endotraqueal. Resultados:La distribución de la presión inicial medida por manómetro muestra tendencia al sobreinflado de la estimación por dígito-palpación, con coeficiente de correlación kappa de 0,6. La variable presión final por manómetro muestra tendencia a la pérdida de presión respecto a la inicial estandarizada. No se encuentra relación estadísticamente significativa entre presión final por manómetro y posición quirúrgica, tamaño de tubo o tiempo quirúrgico (aunque en cirugías de más de 3 horas la presión final es claramente inferior al resto). (AU)

Introduction:Endotracheal cuff pressure is not routinely controlled during surgical interventions. Objective measurements are replaced by palpation-based estimations which are inexact and tending to hyperinsuflation. This causes postoperative complications (throat pain, coughing and hoarseness). The aim of this study is evaluating the reliability of endotracheal cuff pressure assessed by palpation of expertise clinicians. Materials and methods:A transversal descriptive study was performed in patients electively operated under general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in our hospital between October and December 2020. 138 patients were included. Biometric parameters and cuff palpation-based pressure were registered. It was compared to manometer-based pressure measurement and adjusted in all cases to a standardized pressure (30 cm H2O). Final procedure pressure was also measured with manometer, and its relationship with initial pressure and surgical position, intervention length and endotracheal tube diameter was analysed. Results:Initial manometer-based pressure measurement shows palpation-based measurement tends to hyperinsuflation, with a 0,6 kappa correlation coefficient. Manometer-based final cuff pressure shows tendency to decrease when compared to initial standardised pressure. No statistically significant relationship was found between final cuff pressure and surgical position, tube diameter or intervention length (even though interventions above 3 hours show significantly inferior final pressure values). (AU)

Cuffed versus uncuffed tracheal tubes in a rabbit training model for establishing an emergency front-of-neck airway in infants: a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal type of tracheal tube to be advanced over a Frova catheter when performing a 'bougie' emergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA) technique in infants during a 'cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate' situation. METHODS: A prospective non-inferiority trial in a rabbit cadaver surgical tracheotomy model to assess the performance of the eFONA technique with an uncuffed 3.5 mm ID tracheal tube vs a cuffed 3.0 mm ID tracheal tube. Queried outcomes include success rate, performance time, and severe secondary airway injuries among tracheal tube types. RESULTS: In 60 tracheostomies performed by 30 participants, the overall success rate was 98%. Performance time was independent from tracheal tube choice (uncuffed: 61 s [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-76], cuffed: 64 s [95% CI, 55-79]; P = 0.82). No tracheal tube type was preferred in terms of usability by participants. The cuffed tracheal tube required increased force to be advanced over the Frova catheter and was associated with a risk ratio of 2.5 (95% CI, 0.53-11.9; number needed to harm, 10) for severe secondary airway injuries when compared with the uncuffed tracheal tube. CONCLUSION: In performing eFONA in the rabbit cadaver model, an ID 3.5 uncuffed is non-inferior to an ID 3.0 cuffed tracheal tube regarding performance time and preference by the operator. Greater force application to advance the cuffed tube over the Frova catheter and more severe airway injuries may argue for the standardised performance of the eFONA technique with a uncuffed tracheal tube in infants.